<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Code Design Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arghwebworks.com/2009/05/06/code-design-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arghwebworks.com/2009/05/06/code-design-question/</link>
	<description>True happiness comes from the joy of deeds well done, the zest of creating things new --- Antoine de Saint-Exupery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:29:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Quiet Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.arghwebworks.com/2009/05/06/code-design-question/comment-page-1/#comment-22820</link>
		<dc:creator>A Quiet Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghwebworks.com/?p=117#comment-22820</guid>
		<description>Erm, not that I can really read object-oriented PHP, but it seems to me that if you don&#039;t have something that would be a direct descendant of the original object, that it shouldn&#039;t be classed, or even made into a method.  I vote for &quot;don&#039;t tie the two together&quot;, unless of course, you intend to make a &quot;Facebook&quot; about &quot;pets&quot; (extension, which I assume is roughly translated as &quot;inheritance&quot;) or you want to have some property of pets that is a &quot;Facebook&quot; (facebook variable).  So, yeah, don&#039;t tie them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, not that I can really read object-oriented <a href="http://www.php.net" class="ubernym uttInitialism"><abbr class="uttInitialism" title="PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor">PHP</abbr></a>, but it seems to me that if you don&#8217;t have something that would be a direct descendant of the original object, that it shouldn&#8217;t be classed, or even made into a method.  I vote for &#8220;don&#8217;t tie the two together&#8221;, unless of course, you intend to make a &#8220;Facebook&#8221; about &#8220;pets&#8221; (extension, which I assume is roughly translated as &#8220;inheritance&#8221;) or you want to have some property of pets that is a &#8220;Facebook&#8221; (facebook variable).  So, yeah, don&#8217;t tie them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.227 seconds -->
